Abortion also eventually become the fruit simalakama on the other hand, abortion Indonesia.Di with non-medical reasons is prohibited in Indonesia with a hard but on the other illegal abortion increase the risk of death due to lack of medical facilities and infrastructure, even in part the size of the illegal abortion conducted with the more traditional way to improve risk.
Mortality due to abortion at approximately 11% of maternal mortality and birth hami, which in Indonesia reached 390 per 100,000 live births, a figure that is high enough even for the size of Asia and the world.
But there is one thing that needs to be on the Underline ini.Angka mortality due to abortion is the official government figures, while the abortion is done because the size of the adolescent abortion is illegal. The practice of abortion is done, as adolescents reported by a media publication of the country is estimated to reach
5 million cases per year, an amount which is fantastic even for the size of the world sekalipun.Dan illegal abortion because the youth are at risk of this end with death.
Pro Live v.s Pro Choise
In 1996, events occurred that surprising American public, Paul Hill, a former Presbyterian pastor attacked the Ladies Center abortion clinic in Pensacola, Florida and shot dead two doctors and a nurse and injure some other person.
These events mark a point of extreme groups peseteruan pro and pro choise live in the United States. Abortion issue is divided into two sects of this can cause a politician in the United States increased from kursinya or terdepak. The debate between the two poles when this started happening dilegalkan abortion in the United States in 1973.
Pro Live berargumen that every human being, including the unborn have the right to life, and someone the right to live is part of universal human rights, while a group of pro choise thought that a woman
entitled to decide on the choice of the body, and determine the right choice is a human right that must be protected.
Kubu pro menguat the choise not only in America but also in the world at the time Bill Clinton in power. United States government policy at that time the stronghold pro choise among pengucuran government funds to abortion clinics (which was then stopped on the George W Bush in power).
In addition, in the international world the United States government successfully sponsored and affect many countries in the world to support policies that gravitate to the polar pro choise in the conventions of the UN in terms of residence,
family and women.
Abortion policy in Indonesia
Indonesia including one of the countries that oppose abortion pelegalan in the conventions of the United Nations, a citadel of countries with Muslim world, some Latin American countries and the Vatican.
In Indonesia, abortion is considered illegal except on medical reasons to save the life of the mother. Because that is the practice of abortion to be criminal by the state. Fatwas are religious institutions average support government policies, such as Muhammadiyah Tarjih Fatwa Majlis in 1989 about abortion that abortion is allowed for the reason that medical abortion and the reasons for non-medical forbidden.
Indonesia akan but can be rated in the citadel of pro live. The answer can not be so. Although the policy of the government of Indonesia with parktek prohibit abortion inclined to live akan pro stronghold but the policy is to encourage the occurrence of other
practice of abortion. Among the restrictions was that I still sit in the primary and secondary school to get married. Policies that encourage the occurrence of this is the practice of abortion, a pregnant student will be excluded from school and forbidden to continue studynya, other than because of pressure by parents, community and lingku-ngan. Therefore, abortion becomes the best option from the worst that can be taken by a teenager is pregnant outside of marriage.
Conclusion and Analysis
Indeed, to prevent is better than paint. Provide knowledge about beresikonya make sex pre free sex or marriage is one of the most appropriate method to reduce the risk of pregnancy outside marriage. However, when the rice has become porridge kita.Apakah what action we are only limited to the punitive and
judge them only.
Errors they can not be released from our mistakes as well, both as parents, educators and other community components. Therefore it is necessary dicarikan an appropriate solution in addressing this problem.
Indonesia is not as developed countries, where they are already experienced in handling issues like this with all parties involved, whether parents, teachers, friends at school even the government. While Indonesia is a country that bertransisi from community to community tradisonalis modern and even pre-modern does not have the readiness to confront
this problem. So that actions undertaken are also more action as well as removing the panic students are pregnant.
Increased sexual risk behavior and pre-marriage sex free can not be avoided due to the development of modern culture and the rising age of marriage couples. But if the government really be pitied, and also among educators and the community component does not have a concept of effective and clear to face this social phenomenon. Increasing the age of marriage should be also followed by the pembekalan about sex among the youth so that they can control themselves and avoid risky sex behavior is. Akan but cultural taboo sex among teenagers, such as placing a small child who is seen and considered the problem does not need to get sex.
In addition there is need to guarantee, if the government took the policy should be pro live followed policies that are protecting the rights of young people when they experience a pregnancy outside of marriage, including the right to continue education, the right to obtain medical care facilities and adequate psychological and care insurance against the baby akan dilahirkannya.
When insurance-guarantee is not capable of such as are provided by government and non-government organizations and other community components, including parents and educators, the abortion prohibition policy to be counter-productive for
adolescents, and prevention of illegal abortion practices by adolescents to be futile.
No comments:
Post a Comment